Navigating News and Views: ‘Morning Joe’ Hosts Reflect on the Trump Meeting Fallout

The Complex Landscape of News and Opinion

The media landscape is changing, particularly in how political news is reported and consumed. In a particularly striking incident last week, MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski stirred a wave of controversy after their meeting with President-Elect Donald Trump. This backlash highlighted how fragile the relationship between journalism and public sentiment has become.

Jim VandeHei, co-founder of Axios and Politico, defended the hosts on social media, asserting, “It is insane for critics to NOT think all of us in the media need to know more so we can share/report more.” But this perspective raises important questions about what constitutes traditional journalism.

While it may be customary for journalists to engage with a president-elect, “Morning Joe” operates in a realm where opinion often eclipses unbiased reporting. Scarborough, a former congressman, and Brzezinski, a seasoned journalist, have openly supported Democratic candidates like Kamala Harris, frequently criticizing Trump as a “fascist-in-waiting.”

Frank Sesno, a former CNN Washington bureau chief and now a media professor, pointed out the contradiction. “They have portrayed themselves as bastions of integrity standing up to a would-be dictator,” he noted. However, many viewers saw the hosts’ meeting with Trump as a betrayal of their public stance, leading to significant viewer backlash.

Viewer Reaction: A Notable Drop in Ratings

The social media response was swift. Some commenters sarcastically remarked, “You do not need to talk to Hitler to cover him effectively.” The backlash translated into immediate consequences for their show. Following the announcement of their meeting with Trump, the viewership for “Morning Joe” dropped to 770,000, down from its average of 1.09 million. The decline didn’t stop there: viewership plummeted further to 680,000 on Tuesday and 647,000 on Wednesday. While Thursday saw a small rebound to 707,000, executives are understandably concerned about these fluctuating numbers.

The polarized news environment has made viewers less forgiving of perceived compromises in integrity. Kate O’Brian, the outgoing head of news at the E.W. Scripps Company, remarked on the harsh repercussions in today’s media landscape, noting, “The audience for the polarized news-industrial complex has become unforgiving.”

Indeed, this isn’t a unique situation for “Morning Joe.” Last month, The Washington Post reported a loss of approximately 250,000 subscribers after announcing its decision not to endorse a presidential candidate, prompting similar responses from audiences who felt betrayed.

The Shift from Traditional News to Opinion-Based Platforms

The blending of news and opinion is not a modern phenomenon; U.S. newspapers in the 1800s often championed partisan viewpoints. However, for most of the last century, there has been a concerted effort to separate the two. The emergence of Fox News changed the game, catering to a conservative audience that felt overlooked. Now, a variety of platforms, including podcasts, flourish by reflecting their audience’s viewpoints rather than providing balanced reporting.

Indeed, the 2024 campaign season has demonstrated a shift in coverage, marked by the diminishing influence of legacy media brands. For instance, politicians like Trump have turned to podcasts for support, seeking hosts that present his views favorably. Joe Rogan, for example, has notably endorsed Trump, which further underscores this trend away from traditional journalism.

Megyn Kelly’s career trajectory offers a glimpse into this new media climate. Once a prominent Fox News reporter, she angered Trump during a debate and later transitioned to NBC News, which did not yield the expected success. Today, she has found success with a podcast that mirrors conservative and Trump-friendly perspectives.

Compared to other cable news channels, CNN has strived to maintain an image of impartiality, a commitment that ironically has resulted in collapsing ratings. Their election night viewership dropped significantly from 9.1 million in 2020 to 4.7 million, indicating a struggle to retain an audience amid the polarized climate.

The Future of Non-Partisan Journalism

In this challenging environment, Scarborough and Brzezinski continue to navigate the political landscape of “Morning Joe.” While they are skilled hosts, Sesno emphasizes that they are not conducting traditional journalism focused on uncovering the truth.

Following the controversial meeting, MSNBC legal contributor Katie Phang asserted that “normalizing Trump is a bad idea.” Scarborough countered by saying his intentions were misunderstood. The tension between journalistic integrity and the reality of political engagement remains palpable.

As the media industry grapples with these shifts, O’Brian believes there is still a need for non-partisan coverage. “There’s a yearning for a more traditional journalism-based approach,” she noted, suggesting that perhaps exhaustion from the hyper-political environment could rekindle interest in unbiased reporting.

___

David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder.